The seeing of It

If you are blind

You cannot see it

If you have clear vision

You cannot see it

Blindness or sight is not the issue

The issue is you

All of you

If You cannot see it

It is seeing Itself

Advertisements

siseneG

All I am constructing is the method of destruction. 

All I am generating is how to degenerate. 

All I am saying is how to keep silence. 

All I am offering is a way to take it all back. 

All I am enlightening is grey shades of darkness. 

All I am is all I am not. 

A theory of Everything is the practice of Nothing. 

The beginning is near

Elementary particles are not stuffy objects like cars or baseballs. It is not stupid to believe that. Most prominent scientists do. They believe neutrinos are tiny little things that travel through space at close to light speed. 

Billions of them, right through your body, 24/7. In what direction is less clear. But….vrooom…sort of. 

I never believed that. Not really. Now I know why. 

Mass but tiny charge means dense. Dense means less eccentric. Less eccentric means less spacious. Less space means “The Darker Stuff”. Dark Stuff means pretty inert and stuck in a relative “place”.

They do not speed through the universe. They are everywhere and they are close to becoming the tiniest little black holes. 

When the world comes back home to the Parent Singularity, it will do so at incredible pace. If you choose to call that parent God, then God is not only near but everywhere. And S/He is calling at high frequency. If you prefer to say Black Hole Singularity, its offspring is the abundance of neutrinos, holding the more eccentric children in place. 

That will be one place eventually. One place of zero space. 

A massive end is the massive beginning. By force of rotation it will always Turn Outwards to break out as relative spaces. The empirical universe of electric fields. 

Light out of compression

I am still amazed by the many conclusions that keeps popping up because of my original image/idea/fantasy/hypothesis. Yesterday the lights went out. All of them. Light as such was tuned down halfway to pitch black. 

The grey “sphere singularity Godlike zero point” of Universal becoming does not translate to a white hole/black hole 2D disc with grey at half the charge radius. 

It just grows darker around the axis of rotation, so the original grey is gradually extended with the stretching out of its equator. Fully phased out to flat disc, the horizon is just as grey as its origin. Only this time it is flat out charge around a center of compression. There is only charge in empirical reality. 

What makes “light” aka Electromagnetism is the parity of two such grey horizons/orbits. 

God just changes face when smeared out/anointed as the Light of the World. 

Aliveness transformed

Life is motion. All is essentially alive. Only from the narrow and relative perspective of human body is there dead material and living organisms. Getting to know physical matters better, we find it is of profound motion. Not in any way “dead” or “still”. 

The extremes of motion in matter are black pressure and white ex-pression. That is the dual nature of 2D space surfaces. In balance and without polarization, physical matter is grey. Not compressed, nor extended. That is the quantum greyscale of a single body. 

But empirical reality as known is of many bodies. So instead of greyscale there is the electromagnetic spectrum of colours. Where one body is perfectly polarized, two bodies are relatively so. Ellipsoids are in the colours of the rainbow. 

In balance and relative to itself, physical matters are green. 

Life and Death are of the same. One is of two lovers and close relatives. The one we fear as “death” is the lonely, single One. The absolute fact of relative observers. 

Genesis in reverse

Today this though:

Prince Sakyamuni’s Enlightenment is the story of Genesis, in reverse. Or perhaps the Biblical tale of creation is the sequel to the story of how The Exalted One reached Awakening to Buddhanature. 

Genesis tells of The Invisible and Unknowable One, creating all things in existence. Its image is of 1 from 0. 

Enlightenment tells of the Exalted and very much existing human Prince, erasing one thing from existence. Its the image of 0 from 1.

Genesis builds on the actions that generate. Enlightenment builds on the stillness that degenerates. 

Genesis is of the projection. 

Enlightenment of its conjection. 

What great stories they are. How precise and to the point. 

The death of Ego to know Immortality. The dying Lord of Light and the Enlightenment of the royal flesh. 

Phase inversions, again. 

Singularity, again. 

With a little help from Pythagoras

One way of converting 1 to 0 and 0 to 1 is to put Pythagoras theorem in a sphere and let it spin. Goes like this:

a^2 + b^=c^
Let a be the axis of the sphere, and b the radius.
Let axis a be a vertical 1 and b the 0 horizon.
Let a decrease from 1 to 0 Let b increase from 0 to 1

1^2+0^2           =1               sqrt(1) = 1
-.75^2+.25^2   =-.5             sqrt(-.5) = 0.7071067811865475i
-.5^2+.5^2       =0                sqrt(0) = 0
-.25^2+.75^2   =.5              sqrt(.5) = 0.7071067811865475
0^1+1^2          =1                sqrt(1) = 1

So what’s so special with this sequence? Well, what’s special to me might be irrelevant to you so it’s your call really. To me it says:
Imaginary/Invisible spherical equilibrium of 1
is less invisible as the 1 imaginary axis is compressed to -.75 by horizontal tension
and when axial compression -.5 equals horizontal ex-tension .5, there is energized equilibrium which increases in empirical visibility
to the extent where 0 imaginary aspect is to be found at horizon 1.

…and by this, we have generated a real plane out of an imaginary sphere, so 1i has translated itself to a real 1. As I have suggested in other posts, this is not some end state of the function. Axial compression, all the way to 0 “length” does not imply there is something lost of the unit. Spatial length is only horizontal, not vertical. We can assign “gravitational potential” to the axis and know that it is 0 at the moment of sphere, and 1 at the moment of disc.
That being potentially so, the above sequence will invert at c^2 = real 1, and the functional unit will then become increasingly smaller and de-charged. That is how reality is quantized by self-generated “gravity”.

I can also see that there are two distinct forms of equilibrium. The conventional equilibrium would be at -.5^2+.5^2=0. That is, when kinetic energy .5 equals potential energy -.5. This is the equilibrium in the classical world. But the classical world is not of a single unit as in this case. The classical world is of parity, and in a many body system, one thing absolute is, by definition, everything relative. So the other equilibrium, and in my opinion the far more interesting one, is the spherical one where there is no energy at all. This is a grey state of neither extension, nor compression. It is essentially dead to the empirical world of observation. This is when 1 is a purely imaginary 1i. In relation to the mod4 of imaginary numbers we can see that whenever i is raised to the power of even numbers e.g. -4, -2, 0, 2, 4 etc, it equals 1 or -1, but raised to odd numbers e.g. -3, -1, 1, 3 etc, it equals i or –i.
So how come the real power of the imaginary part rise only to the power of equals? Well, if my model is correct, it has to be so on the most fundamental level of single quantum mechanics/functions/operations. That is because any instance of kinetic charge has at its (invisible) center an equal amount of compression. So the power of 2 comes hand in hand in any realized, empirically detectable object. That is not to say there is no power of oddities, because obviously there is . Point is that such powers are of relatives and not absolutes, so instead of 1 or -1 we get i or -i. It is real values for sure, but they do not belong to a specific unit that can be empirically defined. It is more like “field” values.

Anyways, that’s what I find tasty food for thought because it plays very well with my imagination. But others work with other ideas, and perhaps you will find other valuables than I do.

Since the number 0.7071067811865475 turned up, both as i when function is ¼ real and as real when function is ¼ imaginary, I googled it and found something slightly interesting, even for someone who knows next to nothing about math.

For an example of an operator that throws its basis Kets into superpositions, here’s a function emulating a Hadamard operator:

julia> @def_op ” h | n > = 1/√2 * ( | 0 > + (-1)^n *| 1 > )”

h (generic function with 1 methods)

 

julia> d” h * | 0 > ”

Ket{KroneckerDelta,1,Float64} with 2 state(s):

0.7071067811865475 | 0

0.7071067811865475 | 1

 

julia> d” h * | 1 > ”

Ket{KroneckerDelta,1,Float64} with 2 state(s):

0.7071067811865475 | 0 ⟩

-0.7071067811865475 | 1 ⟩

 

Make of it what you will. There is something of importance going on there.
That’s what I think.